East Herts https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/ We are the Green Party in East Hertfordshire Mon, 08 Jan 2024 14:19:23 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/120/2023/06/cropped-green-party-logo-forest-32x32.jpg East Herts https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/ 32 32 Flooding in East Herts https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/2024/01/08/flooding-in-east-herts/ Mon, 08 Jan 2024 14:19:23 +0000 https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/?p=2269 Flooding: Unprecedented or Our Future? Over the last weeks we have been deluged with unwelcome rainfall in East Herts, in part due to Storm Henk. Hertfordshire County Council received over 1045 reports of flooding and fallen trees during the storm. There have been flood warnings on the rivers Lee and Ash. Local residents have experienced [...]

Read More... from Flooding in East Herts

The post Flooding in East Herts appeared first on East Herts.

]]>

Flooding: Unprecedented or Our Future?

Over the last weeks we have been deluged with unwelcome rainfall in East Herts, in part due to Storm Henk. Hertfordshire County Council received over 1045 reports of flooding and fallen trees during the storm. There have been flood warnings on the rivers Lee and Ash. Local residents have experienced flooding to property and roads - for instance in the usual hotspots of Cromwell Road in Hertford and the North Road junction by Hertford North station, plus Hoe Lane in Ware. People have had challenges travelling around safely by personal vehicle (with accidents on major roads such as the A414 and fords impassable, for example in Much Hadham), by public transport (as trains have been disrupted by rainfall) and spare a thought for cyclists and pedestrians who brave a drenching from passing traffic every journey.

As residents of East Herts, we have become accustomed to localised flooding - our Councillors in East Herts Green Party receive multiple reports of blocked drains unable to cope with excess water, rivers bursting their banks and widespread saturation of rural fields and pathways. We also see gullies overflowing into foul sewers, which risks overloading pipework and sewage treatment plants, resulting in sewage dumping into our beautiful chalk streams and even residents’ gardens. Residents are making connections between house building, inadequate plans for surface water drainage and the impact of additional run-off into our local waterways, or wherever the water can find a place to go. There is also a notable impatience about who is responsible for fixing the problem of flooding, which we hear about frequently.

So who is responsible for dealing with flooding?

Managing flood risk from all main rivers and the sea is the responsibility of the Environment Agency. If you see one of our local rivers blocked, or waters rising alarmingly high threatening banks to break, please raise the issue with them.

In general, taking surface water away from highways and keeping roads, footpaths, drains and gullies clear and properly functioning are the responsibility of the Highways Authority at Herts County Council.

Water and sewage companies are responsible for public sewers and utility pipes. So if your home or garden is affected by overflowing sewage, you need to contact your water company.

At a domestic level - we can all play a part. Home-owners have a duty of care to keep their gutters and drains clear, to avoid damaging neighbours’ property and must install adequate drainage measures during building works or face enforcement action. The common law right to drainage means that water is allowed to naturally flow from higher land downhill onto neighbouring lower land but modern interference causes problems so that flow of water can no longer be deemed natural. Obstructions such as walls or raised patios can cause flooding elsewhere nearby and need to be carefully managed.

There have been significant changes to law on surface water drainage in recent years, with the introduction of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) regulations in 2015. SuDS are designed to replicate natural drainage and manage surface water at its source to reduce flood risk. Local authorities such as East Herts District Council have been given greater responsibility for approving and enforcing SuDS in new developments. They will consult Herts County Council who advise the local planning authority on whether proposed drainage schemes comply with the relevant technical standards and policies.

What about responsibility in rural areas? Watercourse owners have a responsibility to maintain any “ordinary” watercourse (anything that is not a river; such as ditch, stream or culvert) that flows through or under their property. Maintenance includes removing blockages to prevent natural flow. They have to report incidents of flooding but are not actually responsible for reducing the risk of flooding. This falls to a Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) - in our case Herts County Council.

However, to the local resident, this complicated separation of responsibility across many authorities and individuals is frustrating. If you’ve ever tried to report a problem with flooding and get a swift resolution that lasts, you will understand. And with local councils’ budgets severely squeezed, so that impossible choices have to be made about which services must be reduced or cut, we’re left in a quandary of trying to use a sticking plaster to heal a gaping wound.

Managing the risk of flooding and dealing with the after-effects of excess water ingress are only two responses to a much bigger problem. Our government needs to understand how climate change is affecting global and local weather systems, and act boldly to minimise the impact. It’s all very well unveiling additional support packages for homeowners and businesses affected by flooding, but this is not tackling the issue at source. We need significant funding and immediate action to reduce the emissions which are causing the planet to warm, and subsequently increasing the likelihood of more severe weather events and normalising the heavy rainfall we’ve seen causing flooding locally.

Only the Green Party is committed to investing what is necessary to bring down emissions.

#DefendingOurEnvironment

The post Flooding in East Herts appeared first on East Herts.

]]>
200 Days in Office https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/2023/12/04/200-days-in-office/ Mon, 04 Dec 2023 19:22:23 +0000 https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/?p=2249 EAST HERTS GREEN COUNCILLORS CELEBRATE 200 DAYS IN OFFICE It’s 200 days since Green Party Councillors took control at Ware and Hertford Town Councils, and became the largest party on East Herts District Council. On December 3rd, 2023, East Herts Green Councillors marked the milestone, which followed the historic election in May when East Herts [...]

Read More... from 200 Days in Office

The post 200 Days in Office appeared first on East Herts.

]]>

EAST HERTS GREEN COUNCILLORS CELEBRATE 200 DAYS IN OFFICE

It’s 200 days since Green Party Councillors took control at Ware and Hertford Town Councils, and became the largest party on East Herts District Council. On December 3rd, 2023, East Herts Green Councillors marked the milestone, which followed the historic election in May when East Herts Green Party was one of the most successful in the country.

Here they reflect on their achievements and early successes for East Herts District, Hertford Town and Ware Town Council.

Green Councillors

Councillor Ben Crystall, Leader of East Herts District Council, said:

“I’m thrilled at how much we’ve achieved in just 200 days. Our Councillors hit the ground running, have responded positively to many hundreds of queries and messages from residents, and are now working hard to deliver genuine change for East Herts. And while our team is also facing up to some huge challenges, we are determined to be open, honest and to continue our efforts to listen to the community. That’s how we’ll deliver positive change.” 

Councillor Vicky Smith, Leader of Hertford Town Council and Mayor, said:

“I’ve been so impressed with how our Green Councillors are driving forward changes and improvements for our town in such a dynamic way. I’m really proud of how the team of councillors and officers all work together so well for the benefit of our residents and I’m excited about what the future holds.”

Councillor Thomas Day, Leader of Ware Town Council and Mayor, said:

“Since gaining a majority on Ware Town Council in May, my colleagues and I have been speaking to residents and working hard to help them with the issues affecting their daily lives. As a council we want to be an advocate for the town; its residents, the many community organisations and its vibrant and diverse independent business community."

 East Herts District Council Top 10 Achievements over the first 200 days:

  • Launched ‘Thriving Together’, a new plan for how we will work with residents and community groups to tackle critical issues such as isolation and loneliness and help increase community wellbeing.
  • Approved a critical Climate Emergency motion laying out an accelerated path to net-zero emissions, cleaner air and an improved environment for all.
  • Distributed hundreds of thousands of pounds of UK shared prosperity funds, ensuring that the money is being shared effectively around the district to boost small businesses and town and parish councils.
  • Launched a trial to rejuvenate town markets – starting in Hertford and hopefully rolling out across the District as a way to support thriving town centres.
  • Developed a plan to reshape parking, starting in Bishop’s Stortford (and including real-time parking-availability displays) to help reduce congestion, improve air quality and make town centres even more attractive for shoppers.
  • Campaigned successfully against train station ticket office closures, a proposal that was subsequently dropped by rail companies.
  • Launched District-wide campaigns including ‘Breathe Clean’ that highlights simple actions we can all take to reduce and protect ourselves from air pollution, and the ‘Worth Saving’ initiative to cut food waste and save residents money.
  • Relaunched ‘Solar Together’ - a group-buying scheme that gives residents a good deal on new solar panels and batteries for their homes.
  • Kicked off a consultation on a new Air Quality Action Plan to reduce air pollution and improve resident health.
  • Set out a new strategy to improve the way the council listens to and consults with the community, to help us make better decisions and form a stronger partnership with residents.

Hertford Town Council Top 10 Highlights over the first 200 days

  • Awarded grants to multiple charities, including CHIPS, Sele Ward Neighbourhood Association and St Andrew’s Church, and held several fundraising events, including a food-tasting evening in collaboration with Mudlarks, Christmas wreath making and a Castle Open Day.
  • Built on the adoption of the Climate Emergency motion in July, by examining ways to make all of the council’s operations sustainable and carbon neutral by 2030.
  • Implemented new Christmas lights for Hertford and organised the popular Christmas Market.
  • Consulted with Cromwell Road allotment holders and residents to explore access arrangements and provide opportunities to feedback on next steps.
  • Took the decision to phase out the use of pesticides on allotments to protect our rivers and local wildlife such as newts, grass snakes and slow worms.
  • Set objectives for the new Administration, centred around making Hertford more vibrant, green and inclusive.
  • Undertook a thorough review of council finances to set budgets for the new financial year in April 2024 with a view to mitigating the impact of inflation on council spending.
  • Launched the Refill Revolution to encourage local businesses in Hertford to cut plastic pollution.
  • Held multiple councillor surgeries in all of Hertford’s town wards to strengthen resident engagement and provide opportunities for community feedback.
  • The Mayor, Vicky Smith, has attended numerous events including Remembrance Sunday, HDOS productions and the Hertfordshire Festival of Music plus she has visited multiple schools, Scout and Brownie groups.

Ware Town Council Top 10 Highlights over the first 200 days

  • Focused on engagement with the community by establishing a regular presence at the monthly market in Tudor Square and attending meetings of community group Local Social.
  • Adopted the Neighbourhood Plan following the overwhelming positive result in the referendum, to ensure the residents of Ware have a say in any future planned developments within Ware Town limits.
  • Improved the local environment and street scene with an extended deep clean of the town centre and a specialised clean of the Ware Memorial to ensure no long-lasting damage occurs to this important local monument.
  • Introduced a winter opening schedule for Ware Lido with special heated swimming event across the festive period and then cold-water swimming throughout January.
  • Implemented upgrades to Ware Skate Park to improve appearance and landscaping and agreed changes to Priory grounds to increase biodiversity with planting of mixed hedgerows.
  • Awarded multiple grants to charities including several local sports, community and support groups.
  • Ran a successful series of summer school holiday events and activities for all including the Ware Festival and Film nights.
  • Set ambitious targets for Ware Town Council to be carbon neutral by 2030 and implemented a policy of plastic and single-use reduction to minimise waste and environmental impact.
  • The Mayor, Thomas Day, has attended numerous events and hosted a fun quiz night in support of the Mayor’s Charity – Citizens Advice East Herts.
  • All councillors have been busy supporting their ward members to resolve problems including issues with flooding across parts of Ware, escalating building control concerns, ensuring the New River is cleared of summer sludge, promoting adoption of Swift boxes. They’ve also been out and about door-knocking to engage with and get feedback from the residents of Ware.

The post 200 Days in Office appeared first on East Herts.

]]>
Ward Freman Pool Closure – Open Letter https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/2023/12/03/ward-freman/ Sun, 03 Dec 2023 10:40:08 +0000 https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/?p=2215 2nd December 2023 To whom it may concern, Ward Freman Pool, Buntingford, Herts This is an open letter to address questions surrounding Ward Freman pool.  While we are focused on seeking a positive solution for funding the repairs, we are aware that many people want to understand how the pool reached a state of needing [...]

Read More... from Ward Freman Pool Closure – Open Letter

The post Ward Freman Pool Closure – Open Letter appeared first on East Herts.

]]>

2nd December 2023

To whom it may concern,

Ward Freman Pool, Buntingford, Herts

This is an open letter to address questions surrounding Ward Freman pool.  While we are focused on seeking a positive solution for funding the repairs, we are aware that many people want to understand how the pool reached a state of needing to close due to concerns to health. In brief:

  • Responsibility for paying for Ward Freman is split 60%/40% between East Herts District Council (EHDC), and Hertfordshire County Council (HCC).
  • Until May 2023, both EHDC and HCC were under Conservative administration. No agreement between the administrations was reached to fund the work needed.
  • While budget had been ‘approved’ for work to take place in 2020, the spend repeatedly did not take place. Funding was removed from the capital budget in March 2023.
  • In May 2023, EHDC changed to a Green/LibDem joint administration. We inherited an extremely challenging budget and considerable existing investment commitments.
  • We are currently exploring multiple options for financing the work, and we hope to find a way of bringing the pool back into use.

Background

Ward Freman pool was built about 40 years ago.  The building is owned by Hertfordshire County Council (HCC), while East Herts District Council (EHDC) is responsible for provision of services, which are contracted to Everyone Active.  Part of the arrangement with the pool is that it is part used by the school for education purposes.  The arrangement for funding is that Hertfordshire County Council is responsible for 40% of the costs, and East Herts District Council is responsible for 60%.  Due to this arrangement, Ward Freman is referred to as a “joint-use” facility.  The two other joint-use facilities are Fanshawe in Ware, and Leventhorpe in Sawbridgeworth.  Until May 2023, both Hertfordshire County Council and East Herts District Council were under a Conservative administration.

2016 – a ‘Task and Finish’ group looked at all five EHDC leisure facilities, including the three joint-use facilities. Ward Freman pool was noted as being severely loss making (c. £115,000 per year).  The two other joint-use facilities also ran at a loss, but not as significant.  Several potential options for the future of the five sites were explored within the document. There was hesitation around investing in the joint-use facilities for fear of losing the 40% funding from HCC.  The preferred option was to make strategic investments in Grange Paddocks and Hartham Leisure Centre, as these are owned by EHDC, and then develop a plan regarding joint-use facilities.  The option of closing Ward Freman and the other joint-use facilities was reserved in the event that other options had been fully explored and found not to be viable.

2017 – At the Executive meeting on 27th June 2017, following further work by the ‘task and finish’ group, a proposal was put to the Executive to redevelop Ward Freman to include a small gym facility.  £881,000 was approved in principle for redevelopment including a small gym on the ground floor, retiling the pool surrounds, redecorating the pool and refurbishing/remodelling the changing areas.  This later appeared in the Capital Programme 2019/2020 – 2022/2023, budgeted for the year 2020.

2020 – While spend for Ward Freman was initially budgeted for in 2020, due to being a joint-use facility, the ability to fund the identified project was always dependent on HCC funding the 40% share.  At that point, an agreement could not be reached, and the work did not progress.

2020 to 2023 – Looking through the various documents and minutes (full links available below), it is possible to see that the budgeted amount, originally set for 2020, was repeatedly pushed forward as budget pressures mounted.  Stated reasons for budget pressures include increased costs of existing capital projects due to Brexit, the impact of Covid-19, and the impact of increased inflation. Increased borrowing to help fund existing capital projects also added significant budget pressure.  During this time, while some small upgrades were made to Ward Freman, for example a carpet fitted in the reception area, no significant investments took place.  Meanwhile, essential components to the pool continued to deteriorate through wear and tear.  Eventually, in the budget plan put forward to full council in March 2023, it was agreed that it was necessary to pause multiple capital projects in order to manage the budget.  At this point, the spend for Ward Freman was taking out of the budget and moved to ‘approved not yet committed’, for the financial year 2025 – 2026.  Essentially, no budget was made available or set aside for Ward Freman, nor was one anticipated until at least 2025/2026.

Present

As the new Green/LibDem administration, elected in May 2023, we learnt more about Ward Freman over the summer of 2023, including the now urgent need for the boiler and filtration system to be upgraded, and for a suspected leak in the pool tank to be addressed.  Collectively, these repairs came at significant cost, and we were also advised that, in short, neither HCC nor EHDC had the funds to pay for this (see above).  We spent a great deal of time exploring what other alternatives there might have been.  We have since been asked about Section 106, the Swimming Pool Support Fund, and why money was spent on a cycle path and not the pool.  To respond:

Section 106 (money from developments): the ‘education’ portion of this is managed by HCC.  Due to Ward Freman pool being a joint use facility, the EHDC portion of S106 could not be used for this.  We are exploring whether this situation could change were ownership of the facility to transfer to the community, but for now, this pot is not available for EHDC to use for Ward Freman.

Swimming Pool Support Fund, a government fund made available in 2023:  This fund came in two phases.  Phase 1) was to help towards energy costs, and phase 2) was to help towards the capital costs of energy improvements such as solar panels or other such efficiencies.  Unfortunately, neither of these pots funded repairs, and both required a guarantee of the pool being able to remain open.  Given the state of disrepair, this was not something we could do.

The cycle path: although already spent, the question of “why did they build a cycle path rather than invest in the swimming pool?” often comes up.  The cycle path project was a piece of work by Highways at HCC, and it was funded by the government Active Travel Fund.  This money was ringfenced for active travel, and could therefore only ever have been used for that purpose, and not for the pool.

Moving forward

As a Green/LibDem administration, we are committed to exploring all possible avenues that might enable funding for the pool.  We have identified several potential grants which town councils and charity/community groups are eligible to apply for to help towards these costs (local authorities are excluded from applying).  Of particular interest is the Community Ownership Fund, which we are currently investigating.  We are also liaising with HCC and the community, and we have some fantastic residents onboard and helping with this process.

While the pool closed due to the filtration system, there are multiple other significant concerns, including the boiler, the pool tank, and risks due to the age of the building itself.  These issues and their implications all need full exploration.  However, assuming no preventative risks are identified, we remain hopeful that we can find a positive outcome.  We welcome all support on this matter.

Thank you,

Sarah Hopewell

Executive Member for Wellbeing, Green Party Councillor

Links to the fiscal situation from 2020 - 2023

Executive meeting 21st Jan 2020 -  spend for Ward Freman was budgeted for in 2020/2021.  a report where budget pressures were highlighted – available here: Sustainable MTFP 2020 21-2023 24 Report.pdf (eastherts.gov.uk)  budget of £881,000 for Ward Freman was approved for spend 2020/2021: Sustainable MTFP - Appendix C Capital Programme 20-21 onwards.pdf (eastherts.gov.uk)

Weds 10th Feb 2021 joint scrutiny committee Agenda for Joint Meeting of Scrutiny Committees on Wednesday 10th February, 2021, 7.00 pm - East Herts District Council report: financial plan refers to significant council pressures, linked to wider UK economic downturns, impact of Brexit, impact of Covid. The report talks about the need for a revised plan and to find savings: Budget 202122 and Medium Term Financial Plan 202122 to 202425.pdf (eastherts.gov.uk)

Paragraph 2.18.1 references a review of the capital programme, para 2.18.2 speaks of the need for the capital programme to be financed by additional borrowing.  £881k remained in the approved programme for 2021/2022: Budget 202122 and Medium Term Financial Plan 202122 to 202425 Appendix C.pdf (eastherts.gov.uk)  This was taken to the Executive committee in Feb 21

Exec Meeting 8th Feb 2022: para 5.3 refers to borrowing required to fund the capital programme, and the impact of this on budgets due to interest rates. para 11.1 refers to further rephasing of the capital programme that took place in Oct 2021, while para 11.2 refers to the need to finance ongoing capital costs through increased borrowing: Budget 2022-23 and Medium Term Financial Plan 2022-23 2026-27.pdf (eastherts.gov.uk) appendix C, Ward Freman spend indicated for financial year 22/23 Budget 2022-23 and Medium Term Financial Plan - Appendix C.pdf (eastherts.gov.uk)

15th Nov 2022: the Audit & Governance meeting, 1.13 references further slippage of the capital programme, and that owing to increasing pressures, some capital schemes may be recommended to be delayed or stopped. Recommendation d) includes a rephasing of the capital programme, and to identify which schemes could be delayed or cancelled to reduce savings requirements Budget 202324 and Medium Term Financial Plan 2023 2028 Preparation.pdf (eastherts.gov.uk)

Tues 24th Jan 2023, Audit & Governance meeing, 1.14 references increase in interest payable on capital loans. 1.15 “current capital programme has effectively used up the borrowing headroom… it is vital that the capital programme is tightly controlled”  Budget 2023/24 and MTFP 2023-2028 (eastherts.gov.uk)  Ward Freman spend ‘approved not yet committed’ Appendix B Budget 202324 and Medium Term Financial Plan 2023 2028 for scrutiny.pdf (eastherts.gov.uk)

1st March, Full Council Meeting, Minuted: “Councillor Williamson referred to the council’s capital programme. He said the total capital investment across the district would reach £18.4 million of which the council’s major projects contribute £14.9 million. He said the council now had to allow for interest payments and minimum revenue provision of capital borrowing in the MTFP. He said that by pausing some of the lower priority capital projects and moved them into approved but not committed category, the council did not need to allow for financing of these items in the MTFP.”

 

 

The post Ward Freman Pool Closure – Open Letter appeared first on East Herts.

]]>
A Volunteer’s View of The Green Party Conference https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/2023/11/23/a-conference-view/ Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:52:20 +0000 https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/?p=2211 The Ambition for a Better Nation Written by Hope Eyre, Hertford. The recent, annual Green Party conference took place in the eclectic city of Brighton, England at the Brighton Centre. Spanning over 3 days, from the 6th-8th of October, the event was full to the brim with captivating panels, fringes and social events, all with [...]

Read More... from A Volunteer’s View of The Green Party Conference

The post A Volunteer’s View of The Green Party Conference appeared first on East Herts.

]]>

The Ambition for a Better Nation

Written by Hope Eyre, Hertford.

The recent, annual Green Party conference took place in the eclectic city of Brighton, England at the Brighton Centre. Spanning over 3 days, from the 6th-8th of October, the event was full to the brim with captivating panels, fringes and social events, all with the aim of inspiring those who attended and with the hope of motivating spectators to choose a better future for their country. This future being one that is possible, proved by the words of not only key speakers such as Caroline Lucas, Carla Denyer and Adrian Ramsay, but by the powerful messages delivered by county councillors, potential candidates and additionally Zack Polanski, whose own passionate speech driven by ambition and a vision of a brighter future inspired so many who engaged with his presentation.

Personally, my own motivations for attending this event were clear. Being a new member to the Green Party, I had engaged with my local East Herts green group but saw it crucial to understand the deeper workings of the party to better understand what I could do in my own district. I knew, emerging from the conference, I would be equipped with a better comprehension of the background of the party and would understand the qualities of such an organisation as they continue to fight for a better country, socially and environmentally.

After researching and planning my Saturday at the conference, I knew it would be a buzzing day full of engaging events, so I prepared a timetable with the talks and panels I was most interested in, including a Fringe titled, “Make it Local – unlocking socially just transitions through local government” which included many important speakers including the party’s co-leader Carla Denyer and members of the Local Government Association group. I also knew I wanted to attend the speech by the Green Party’s deputy leader, Zack Polanski and the training session by Carl Brittain titled, “boosting your volunteer numbers and how we won big in East Hertfordshire”. As Carl represents my district as campaign manager in East Herts, I knew it would be a great opportunity to understand all the important work done to enable East Hertfordshire to reach great successes in the recent election and to comprehend what further work has to be made to continue this inspiring success. To end the day, the final event I wished to attend was the fringe – “Green Greats”, presented by Siân Berry, who will hopefully take Caroline’s place as Brighton Pavilion MP when she steps down. In this interview the Green Party MP and utterly inspiring Caroline Lucas was interviewed by Roger Harrabin about her career, her successes and her ups and downs during her time in the European Parliament and the House of Commons.

As described by the Green Party, the conference “follow[ed] on from our record local election results across the country” and the event was a key opportunity “to celebrate our breakthroughs and to get general election ready.” But it was also so much more than this. It was an opportunity to say thank you to all those, with either small or big roles in the party, for their tireless efforts in ensuring the success of the party. It was a chance to recognise people’s work, spurring them on to continue this upwards trajectory, since politics never stops. Even though the greens have succeeded immensely, there will always be another election and no one’s seat is ever secure, whether as an MP or a local councillor. The talks and meetings however weren’t a forceful, desperate call from leaders for people to continue their work after failing again and again on delivering original promises. They were inspiring. They made people want to come along for this hopeful journey, providing them with a different, clearer pathway through the political world. The leaders trusted their messages and knew others would to.

After disappointing but rather unsurprising U-turns by the government as The Guardian for example has stated, “Sunak confirmed the UK would push back the deadline for selling new petrol and diesel cars and the phasing out of gas boilers” and his new project regarding the Rosebank Oil Field, the disappointment felt by citizens and green minded individuals is clear. These recent events not only provided direct examples of why the Green Party and its initiatives are so deeply needed in the current political climate but the conference also gave a voice to these ongoing concerns and reminded people why they are fighting against such atrocities.

Arriving on Saturday to the Brighton Centre, ready for the day ahead of me, I gathered my lanyard and folder filled with information about the conference, my voting card for the plenaries and an extra timetable. The energy of the event flooded out of the building. It was clear that attendees and members were ready to engage with the day. They were excited to be at an event filled with new ideas, inspiring policies and fearless speakers. As I navigated my way through the building towards my first fringe, I passed room upon room, filled with people eager to hear about not only the current successes of the Green Party but excited to know where the party’s current direction will take those involved.

As stated, the day and its events were extremely busy, so I think it best to note and explain my key moments and favourite events of the day. If you would however like a more detailed explanation of all the events that took place over the weekend, the timetable and explanations of all talks, meetings and panels are available to view here: https://greenparty.org.uk/resources/Conference/Autumn%202023/autumn-conference-2023-timetable-21.09-v.2.pdf

One stand out moment for myself was the speech by the Green Party’s deputy leader, Zack Polanski. After already being inspired by the first session of the day, I knew I could surely not be disappointed by the deputy leader’s talk. And I was right. I walked into the already packed auditorium where his speech was taking place, however as it got closer to the time of his presentation, the large room became even more full with people impatient to hear his words. By the time he was on stage, almost every seat in the auditorium was taken, people sat on the floor and once he had started talking, even more people filtered into the room, hoping to hear a glimpse of his wisdom. Admittedly, I had not heard much of Polanski before the conference, however now I realise how valuable he and his powerful words are to the party.

As he was introduced by Croydon councillor, Ria Patel, an eruption of applause commenced. It was a sign of respect for Polanski and a sign of appreciation for his presence in the party.

As Zack began his speech, he presented some information about himself, unashamedly to those in the room. Discussing the idea of pride and sense of achievement, he mentioned the pride he feels in all aspects of the word, not only in the Green Party and its core values but also the pride he felt when, at the 2022 Green Party conference, after his speech how his boyfriend Richie joined him on stage. What was shocking and totally inspiring about this fact is how Polanski states, “this was the first time, we believe, in British political history a gay couple had joined each other on stage following a conference speech.” Again, the audience erupted into applause. After relentless conservative efforts to trample LBGTQIA+ rights and freedoms, this comment was a breath of fresh air. It was an affirmative sign that people no matter their sexuality or gender identity, were welcome. Especially after recent Tory slander towards transgender people at their 2023 conference, this seemed like a safe haven. It was clear that there was an alternative route in politics for people, queer or not in which those who did not “conform” to normal standards regarding gender and sexuality were not targeted but seen and appreciated.

Polanski additionally raised his identity as a Jewish man and highlighted how all our differences create a rich “tapestry”. This results in a situation where we are all seen, all heard and all respected, creating a world which everyone feels safe to live in.

As he moves on to discuss the Green Party as a whole and the upcoming general election, Zack refers to us familiarly, as “friends” and simply says, “we are ready”. You cannot help but believe him in that moment. Although the Green Party is perhaps not yet one of the main parties, like Labour or Conservative, the energy radiating from Polanski and every person in the room gives you a genuine feeling of hope for the upcoming political season.

Throughout the speech, Polanski provides a feeling of comradery between all those present. You feel like you’ve known him for ages. There is not the common divide between leaders and members, which is why I believe so many people have and continue to support the party. It is a hopeful and driven political community rather than a hierarchy of power. This is especially clear when Polanski mentions how he has visited green constituencies and districts all over the country during the time of the local election in May 2023, supporting and listening to them.

Polanski carried on to mention some key wins for the Green Party on that election night. He detailed how seats were amazingly won by greens in seemingly clear Tory supported areas. Many of these seats in particular won by young greens. Polanski details how “on that night, 16 young greens were elected as councillors”. This reflects not only that British citizens have genuine hope in the Green Party and feel confident placing their trust in the “underdog”. However it also proves how young political voices are so important. It has been said many times, but the youth are the ones who will take up the legacy of what older generations will leave behind. It is imperative that the younger generations get involved in the political arena and the fact that so many greens were elected is proof of how the Green Party is looking towards the future and planning for the years to come.

One of the final points put forward by Polanski surrounds the idea of poverty and more specifically child poverty. He details how, “one in four children in this country is living in poverty.” Polanski continues to explain how the two main parties in our country have failed over and over again to prevent this cycle which does nothing but perpetuate a dangerous situation for so many families and young people. However he promises, “we will challenge it”. “It” being the pattern of child poverty but also so many other issues that still stand in our country. Whilst he explains Labour and Conservative have made minimal to no progress with these issues, it is difficult to not be filled with optimism by his words of progress and improvement. Of course the journey to change these current situations will not be easy or plain-sailing, but it will be well worth it and the people of Britain deserve it.

As Polanski’s speech comes to a close, he ends with some key takeaways, which sum up his presentation wonderfully. He notes a quote by the Welsh Raymond Williams - “to be truly radical is to make hope possible, not despair convincing.” The optimism of the Green Party is something unmatched to current political narratives which we hear nowadays. The lack of hope and genuine ambition in so many parties truly helps make the greens stand out. It provides something for people to believe in and fight for. They can understand there is the possibility to change the problems we face, rather than wallowing in our despair and gaining nothing from governments empty promises. People desperately want change and a dynamic force to steer them away from the current crises and Polanski proved that the Green Party may just be able to do that.

Following on from this, Zack mentions the fact that “there is no environmental justice without racial, social and economic justice too.” For those who have thought previously that the Green Party is just focused on the environment, it is worth thinking again. Of course a core value of the party is fighting the climate crisis, but that is only because it is essential to protect our environment which is rapidly declining in health, quicker than anyone would like to admit. However there are so many more key goals for the Green Party. All of these issues need to be tackled and after listening to his speech, it seems truly possible that the Green Party could do some much needed good for our country in all aspects.

Another key event of the day was the interview of Caroline Lucas (the Greens only MP) by Roger Harrabin. After Caroline’s key work in parliament and as she prepares to step down as MP, hoping to give way to the very promising Siân Berry, it was clear that this talk was not to be missed. Being one of the final events of the day, it could be expected that people’s energy would be low and attendance would be faltering however the talk was extremely well attended and all those in the room were excited to hear the wise words of Caroline – seen as a legend not only in green politics but in British politics as a whole. We settled down to hear about Caroline’s career, her future and the way she sees not only the party progressing but also parliament as a whole.

As the talk began, Siân presented a video of some of Caroline’s best moments during her time as an MP. Although difficult to choose just some of her best moments, the short film showed her strength and determination throughout her time in parliament, proving just how much of a positive driving force she was. Some of these highlights included her confrontation to the Sun and its extremely controversial Page Three being available to see in eight places in the House of Commons, her face-off with Jacob Rees-Mog and conservative’s false ideals of democracy as he lay slouched on the benches of the House of Commons and her encounter with the Conservatives on their lack of action taken on the growing climate emergency. The short film was filled to the brim with poignant examples of Caroline taking issues to government and demanding change, with the hope of providing better for Britain. Caroline knew she had a voice, with which she could speak for so many people and she used that voice at every opportunity.

After this truly inspirational video, Roger began asking some light hearted questions to Caroline. When asked what was the most mischievous thing she’s done, reminding us of the rather iconic answer by Theresa May when she was asked, Caroline comedically says it was her, “taking sweets out of Woolworths pick and mix”. After this statement she says, “you’ll notice it was a chain, it wasn’t a nice, small local shop”, her humour showing through. After answering a question that her favourite colour is purple, she humorously states, “that’s UKIP, that’s not nice” and Roger responds, “Nigel would love it”. The conversation is rather effortless, it seems like you’re in a room with friends, rather than just listening to an extremely wise MP. Her authenticity shone through her answers and you immediately feel settled in the presence of such an extraordinary personality.

As the interview progresses, we see a glimpse into Caroline’s entrance into green politics and the Green Party. We hear who inspired her, as she notably mentions the book, “Seeing Green” by Jonathon Porritt. It is fascinating to hear the ways she was introduced into the world of politics and although as she admits she “was a late starter” into the Green Party, if anything this provides a sense of hope. Even though Caroline entered this world potentially late, it is impossible to deny the incredible work she has done not just for the environment but for social and economic issues. She is proof that it is never too late and if you are passionate about something, there is always an opportunity to make a change.

Explaining how she got into the Green Party professionally she explains she was accepted for a job to be a Green Party press officer after completing her PhD in 16th Century Literary Romance. Again she proves how she worked her way up the political ladder, like so many. She wasn’t handed the opportunity to enter British politics on a silver platter but knew her values and the beliefs of the Green Party and took those with her on her journey into parliament, reflecting her drive and tenacity - two extremely important qualities to possess when perusing a career in politics.

Explaining how in Oxfordshire, she ran for election, she stated how she was “the first green elected to Oxfordshire county council.” Whilst on this subject, she details her time on the county council, she explains the difficulties – as most of those in the council were considerably older and members of the conservative party. Being a young member of the council, being the first green and having an extremely young child at that time really does prove Roger’s point of how “it was a great thing to do”.

Moving on, Caroline details her time in the European Parliament for 10 years from 1999, you can’t deny the appreciation she had for that time in her life. As she states, “you were joining a green group […] that was made up of anywhere between 40 or 50 or 60 colleagues.” She goes onto explain how these colleagues were not only in parliaments across Europe but also governments. Surely this provided so much hope and ambition for British greens. Being able to see this huge power that the Green Party had managed to maintain across Europe must have provided a huge motivation that we could do it too in Britain, we just had to keep pushing. But the proof was there.

When asked about her key times in parliament and which moments she is most proud of (among many that she could have chosen), one of them was the proposition of introducing a GCSE in Natural History. Caroline simply explained the importance of this and why she believes it could make such a difference, stating how young people don’t necessarily feel a link to the outside world. She quotes a phrase from Richard’s Louv’s book Last Child in the Woods – “we won’t protect what we don’t love, and we won’t love what we don’t know and we won’t know what we don’t feel, touch, smell, taste and hear”. This is an extremely poignant point and she is absolutely right in raising it. If we don’t understand the environment and subsequently believe why it needs to be saved, there will be no passion to make these environmental changes. Admiration of the world can be created again through teaching, which not only highlights the importance of education but this teaching may also create truly outstanding results for our world, which are currently crucial.

In the final question of the interview, Caroline is asked what the epitaph on her gravestone would be. She simply states, after a few moments of thought, “never believe you can’t make a difference.” I believe this sums up Caroline’s interview and her broader work in the Green Party perfectly. She never gave into the idea that her voice wasn’t loud enough or valid enough. Being the only green MP was surely a lonely time at points and her ideas would have been without a doubt drowned out by those MPs of the main parties. However Caroline did not let that deter her from creating massive progress for green initiatives whilst in parliament. As she explains “its so powerful for the right to tell us that we can’t make a difference, that individuals can’t make a difference and so then people lose their sense of agency.” This sometimes invisible and benign hand of the Right, which stops action by people who think a better country is possible is crucial to recognise and stop. As Caroline explains, “it just feels so important to me that we […] make sure people know that they can make a difference because that’s the only way that things will change.” She is completely justified in how she speaks. The sooner we start to view activism for a better country as a positive and free ourselves of the Right’s hand keeping our mouths shut, the sooner we will discover better economic, social and environmental solutions for our country and the wider world, which is surely what we all crave. Of course the journey to this brighter, fairer and greener country will not be easy but we know we need it and the prospect of progress is incredibly exciting.

For the last portion of the interview, the microphone is turned to the audience as they have a chance to ask Caroline some questions, posing the opportunity gain a little more of her genuine wisdom. She answers every question with some hard but undeniable truths about the current state of government, however she never fails to provide some glimpses of hope in her answers. In every answer she has the ability to encourage us to push forward as greens, again acknowledging that better solutions to our problems are out there. Her energy and eagerness for better is contagious and it is very compelling to think about the future of the party and parliament as a whole.

Walking out of Caroline’s interview and as the day came to a close, it was hard to describe how I felt. The day had completely exceeded my expectations and I left the Brighton Centre with a true mix of feelings. I was overcome with joy and pride for the party’s incredible progress. I felt incredibly inspired, as though I wanted to start door knocking and canvassing from that very moment. It also had a rather bittersweet feeling however. I and so many others who attended the conference understood the potential of the Green Party to be a main political party however it was now our responsibility to make sure that was shared with people up and down the country, showing them the capability of the greens. It felt like a very important responsibility, but one I was happy to carry. It wasn’t a heavy responsibility but a hopeful one and I am, along with so many others, very excited to see where the greens and the Green Party go from here.

The post A Volunteer’s View of The Green Party Conference appeared first on East Herts.

]]>
Water Crisis Declared in East Herts https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/2023/11/06/water-crisis-declared-in-east-herts/ Mon, 06 Nov 2023 12:21:48 +0000 https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/?p=2185 A WATER CRISIS IS DECLARED IN EAST HERTFORDSHIRE   Motion proposed by Cllr Nick Cox, and seconded by Cllr Martin Butcher, at the Eastern Region Green Party AGM yesterday. Passed unanimously.   Full transcript:   The Eastern Region Green Party notes that East Hertfordshire is home to seven of only 210 rare chalk streams in [...]

Read More... from Water Crisis Declared in East Herts

The post Water Crisis Declared in East Herts appeared first on East Herts.

]]>
Water Crisis Declared
A WATER CRISIS IS DECLARED IN EAST HERTFORDSHIRE

 

🔹Motion proposed by Cllr Nick Cox, and seconded by Cllr Martin Butcher, at the Eastern Region Green Party AGM yesterday. Passed unanimously.

 

Full transcript:

 

The Eastern Region Green Party notes that East Hertfordshire is home to seven of only 210 rare chalk streams in the world.

 

The Party also notes that the Environment Agency reported that in 2022 there were 169 discharges of raw sewage into East Herts’ rivers for a combined 1,799 hours equating to nearly 75 days of discharging.

 

The Party further notes that many of the recommendations of the water cycle studies document, “Hertfordshire Water Study 2017”, have been ignored, particularly:

 

🔹Planning for strategic intervention by 2031 to ensure sufficient availability.
🔹A holistic implementation masterplan, including an integrated sustainable water system aimed at achieving water neutrality for new settlements.
🔹That reliance on water imports should be reduced.

 

We are sleepwalking towards a major environmental disaster for Hertfordshire’s chalk streams, including significant harm to biodiversity and adverse impacts on irreplaceable habitats.

 

The Party therefore declares an ecological emergency and pledges to act as guardians of our rivers, reducing the threats to their health and survival. We call on all citizens of East Hertfordshire to engage with our chalk streams in a relationship of respect and stewardship and to cease their exploitation.

 

Furthermore, we issue this Declaration of the Rights of the River Lea, its tributaries, and aquifers having the following rights arising from their very existence in nature:

 

🔹The right to flow and be free from over-abstraction.
🔹The right to be free from pollution.
🔹The right to perform its essential functions of flooding, moving sediment, recharging groundwater, and sustaining biodiversity.
🔹The right to feed and be fed by sustainable aquifers.
🔹The right to native biodiversity.
🔹The right to restoration.
🔹The right to maintain its connections with other streams and rivers.

 

In declaring the rights of the river Lea, we are, at the same time, declaring the rights of all rivers. We acknowledge especially, the rights of the tributaries of the river Lea including the Rib, Mimram, Beane, Ash, Stort and Quin.

The post Water Crisis Declared in East Herts appeared first on East Herts.

]]>
EHGP Response to Affinity Water Consultation on Water Resources Management Plan https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/2023/02/21/wrmp-response/ Tue, 21 Feb 2023 17:22:05 +0000 https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/?p=1752 Background Affinity Water's Water Resource Management Plan (WRMP) aims to address a significant future shortfall in water resources in their supply area. Population growth, climate change and the demand for water are putting significant pressure on the local environment and water resources in Affinity Water's supply area. Without action – the area Affinity Water supplies [...]

Read More... from EHGP Response to Affinity Water Consultation on Water Resources Management Plan

The post EHGP Response to Affinity Water Consultation on Water Resources Management Plan appeared first on East Herts.

]]>

Background

Affinity Water's Water Resource Management Plan (WRMP) aims to address a significant future shortfall in water resources in their supply area.

Population growth, climate change and the demand for water are putting significant pressure on the local environment and water resources in Affinity Water's supply area.

Without action – the area Affinity Water supplies faces a possible shortfall of 449 million litres a day by 2050. Affinity Water sought to hear what customers and stakeholders thought about their draft plan to help them shape their final plan which they aim to publish in Autumn 2023.

Every five years, Affinity Water produces a WRMP which addresses these future challenges and provides a roadmap for a reliable, resilient, sustainable, efficient and affordable water supply to customers between 2025 and 2075, whilst taking care of the local environment.

The actions include reducing customer demand, driving leakage down further than ever before, smart metering and significant investment in new infrastructure for new sources of water - working across the water industry to plan and share resources regionally. The plan will also make the region's water supplies more resilient to droughts, which are becoming more frequent due to climate change.

The consultation took the form of 8 questions. Please find below the questions and East Herts Green Party's answers.

East Herts Green Party Response

Prepared by Nicholas Cox - February 2023

Q1. Please tell us how well you think we have balanced the main factors relating to our environmental destination in our draft plan. Should we be doing anything differently?

If your mission is to provide sustainable, high-quality water and work together with your community then you have failed dismally because you are destroying our chalk streams and appear to have accumulated a £3 billion liability through lack of investment and you are telling your “community” that we have to pay for your mistakes through higher bills. Why aren't you lobbying and campaigning for property developers to fund part of the cost? Given the international importance of our chalk streams, before Brexit the EU would have part funded restoration projects, why aren't you asking the UK government to match-fund what you would have claimed from the EU?

What else should you be doing differently? In addition to the measures mentioned below, Affinity should have a duty to produce a dWRMP that is written in plain English so that members of the public can understand it. It is ludicrous that your company pretends this document can be properly consulted upon when readers require an MSc in Water Resource Management to understand the language you use, let alone comment on your plans in a meaningful way. You should spend some of the many millions you earn in employing science communicators to rewrite your document so that it can be read, understood and consulted upon properly by members of the public.

Q2. Please tell us if there are any other factors that we should take into account in our best value plan. Which do you think are most important?

You claim that “Best value planning” looks to balance the economic, social and environmental cost of a solution or programme of work while still balancing supply and demand. This is woolly thinking. How precisely do you claim to have balanced the economic, social and environmental costs? How do you attribute an “environmental cost” to a globally important chalk stream? Where are your calculations to demonstrate this?

It would be better to use terms with defined definitions:

“Best available techniques” (BAT) means the available techniques which are the best for preventing or minimising impacts on the environment.

“Best Available Technique Not Entailing Excessive Cost” (BATNEEC), a modification of BAT, was introduced in 1984 with Directive 84/360/EEC and superseded in 1996, by Directive 96/61/EC, which applied the framework concept to, amongst others, the integrated control of water pollution.

Q3. Please tell us how well the adaptive approach addresses your main concerns. Is there a different approach we could use?

It is self-evident that you have not been planning for the future. If you were, then you would not be destroying our precious chalk streams and face an unfunded bill of £3 billion to resolve the problem!

The approach that we would like to see is using a not-for-profit model to maintain a basic resource for both residents and for nature. We want to see Affinity nationalised. While you operate to provide profit for share-holders, it is clear Affinity has little real interest or motivation in properly tackling the issues we face with water shortages in our area.

Q4. Please tell us which measures you consider are most likely to support management of demand and so should be considered for inclusion in our draft plan. Which of the identified options should we prioritise?

Firstly we want to see you stripped of responsibility for our water and your service nationalised. Until that can occur, fixing leaks is obviously the top priority and your target of a 50% leak reduction “beyond 2040” is nowhere near ambitious enough. You need a 50% leak reduction by 2030 and a 90% leak reduction by 2040. Your plan doesn’t mention transformational help for existing residential customers to reduce their consumption to the levels required. You have previously provided water flow regulators and low water shower heads free of charge. This needs to be upgraded and broadened into a permanent campaign, not a one off, and needs to be extended way beyond simply giving each home a water butt. Affinity should be spending its own money on installing large-scale grey-water harvesting systems at all new developments in East Herts to cut fresh water use and retrofitting them at existing sites that use large amounts of water.

Q5. Please tell us your thoughts in relation to the SROs that we have identified.

The six Strategic Resource Options need to be developed and progressed in parallel because time is of the essence and the problem is getting worse.

The uncontentious schemes should commence straight away.

For example, the total closure of Friar's Wash and Redbourn pumping stations and a significant abstraction reduction at Kensworth pumping station offset by transferring more water from Grafham Water reservoir.

Care needs to be taken when transporting water over long distances. Has the risk of importing invasive species been adequately studied?

The water from chalk streams is slightly alkaline with a pH range of 7.4-8.0, high in minerals (esp calcium) and low in nutrients (phosphorus 0.01-0.03mg/l and nitrogen 0.2mg/l) and high in dissolved oxygen. Softer water from other regions might have a lower pH, will this adversely affect local species? Softer water could have a corrosive effect on our chalk beds particularly over the longer term. Have all the necessary environmental impact studies been carried out and peer reviewed? This is critical or your supposed solution could wreak havoc with our precious, delicate chalkstream ecosystems.

Nor is there mention that The New River is still in use today, transferring around 220 million litres of water per day out of our region for London's use. The pumping stations upstream of Hoddesdon should be permanently shut down and offset by building a water recycling facility at the Rye House sewage works and feeding the recycled water, with levels of phosphates at levels suited to natural rivers, into the New River, perhaps using the Essex Road pumping station for this purpose.

Q6. How should we prioritise demand management? Are there other assumptions or risks (in addition to relying on government policy) that we should consider?

The demand management strategy will fail because a) it doesn’t take into account the insane house building targets set by East Herts District Council and Hertfordshire County Council - some 18,000 new houses are planned in East Herts alone, which will require at least 6.2 million litres / day of water (assuming 2.3 people per household using the current average of 150 l/p/d) – with a further 80,000 homes across the county by 2035 and b) the limit to water use stated in Building Regulations at 110 l/p/d, enforced through the East Herts District plan, is completely UNENFORCABLE at the moment.

It is no more than wishful thinking without proper enforcement, and based around developers willingness to install minor adjustments to taps and shower heads etc which have next to no impact. There is nothing to prevent home-owners using as much water as they want. In an affluent area like Hertfordshire, putting a 110l/p/d limit on usage is pure fantasy.

Affinity Water needs to take this issue seriously, and lobby the government to tighten Building Regulations, as well as actively work with developers to install large-scale grey-water harvesting systems on every new development. In the US, energy companies have spent large amounts of their own money as executives realised that spending money on helping residents use less energy would mean they didn’t need to construct another power station. Exactly the same situation applies with water here – Affinity should be spending its own money on installing large-scale grey-water harvesting systems at all new developments in East Herts to cut fresh water use and on retrofitting these systems at existing sites where users have a heavy water demand that can be met with grey water.

Q7. In choosing the 100Mm3 SESRO option we are balancing the impact on local communities against the risk that we won’t have enough water if we need to adapt to a higher environmental destination or can’t achieve the demand reductions. Please tell us how well we are approaching the balance between the environmental destination and the impacts on the host communities and environment. Is there anything we should do differently?

We support all measures taken to reduce abstraction from chalk streams and their aquifers and are in favour of the abstraction reductions planned for rivers including the Ver in Affinity Water’s dWRMP and look forward to the environmental improvements at the Ver, the Beane and the other chalk streams in this area.

However, 100Mm3 is a massive underestimate if you are serious about restoring our chalk streams. 150Mm3 should be the minimum target, with a strategy for going higher should the need arise.

The definition of sustainable abstraction should be to ensure that chalk stream flows are reduced by no more than 10% from natural at the most water-stressed times of the year with a commitment to meet this target on all chalk streams within the region by 2040.

You plan to reduce abstraction by 228 Million litres a year - actually not a lot given that you are currently abstracting about 13 million litres every day from boreholes at Baldock and Letchworth alone. That is 4,745,000,000, or 4.745 billon, litres per year.

Your abstractions have gradually risen to around 50% of average recharge, putting it amongst the most heavily abstracted chalk rivers in the whole World.

The Lawson Report calculates that to meet the 10% recharge limit, abstraction must be reduced by 81%. There is a simple solution, which is to back off pumping the boreholes, let the springs flow, let the river run, let the biodiversity recover, and abstract that same water further downstream.

Q8. Overall, do you think that our draft plan represents the best value plan for Affinity Water customers, communities and the environment? Please tell us what you think and the reasons for your answer.

No. We have about 10% of the Earth’s chalk streams in Hertfordshire. Over-abstraction of water from the chalk aquifer has resulted in our chalk streams being reduced to dangerously low flows; the source of the River Rib has moved downstream to Buntingford, while the Ash is reduced to just 11% of long-term average flows. The draft plan fails acknowledge the urgency of the problem and is not “best value” for the environment. You should be spending money cutting leakage, installing grey-water harvesting systems, working to get the building rules changed so that homes have a proper and enforceable limit to water use, and ending extraction from our chalk streams.

References:

https://chalkaquiferalliance.wordpress.com/

https://www.revivel.org/

The post EHGP Response to Affinity Water Consultation on Water Resources Management Plan appeared first on East Herts.

]]>
EHGP Objection to Land North & East of Ware Hybrid Planning Application https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/2023/02/02/3-22-2406-ful/ Thu, 02 Feb 2023 11:13:19 +0000 https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/?p=1736 Land North & East of Ware, Hertfordshire Ref: 3/22/2406/FUL January 2023 Prepared by Nicholas Cox The Green Belt was established in 1955 to contain urban sprawl, to maintain the separation of settlements, to protect prime agricultural land around settlements, and to encourage urban regeneration and compact towns and cities. It now covers 13% of England; [...]

Read More... from EHGP Objection to Land North & East of Ware Hybrid Planning Application

The post EHGP Objection to Land North & East of Ware Hybrid Planning Application appeared first on East Herts.

]]>

Land North & East of Ware, Hertfordshire

Ref: 3/22/2406/FUL

January 2023
Prepared by Nicholas Cox

The Green Belt was established in 1955 to contain urban sprawl, to maintain the separation of settlements, to protect prime agricultural land around settlements, and to encourage urban regeneration and compact towns and cities. It now covers 13% of England; but increasing development in Hertfordshire’s green belt risks suburbanising the London to Cambridge corridor, swallowing East Hertfordshire into a massive conurbation.

The farmland and woods to the north and east of Ware are a beautiful part of our green and pleasant land. The woods, hills, rivers, and meadows are a resource for all. Generations of Ware residents have enjoyed walking across these fields, have played there as children, and watched crops grow and wildlife thrive as the seasons came and went. Now that’s all under threat from an assault driven by investors and developers putting profit before people and the places they love.

EHDC’s District Plan includes two greenbelt developments of some 18,485 new homes. Northeast Ware and Harlow North (Gilston Area Applications) are planned on the largest release of green belt land in England, representing over 6% of our green belt. It is important to appreciate that the two developments are two sides of the same coin and should be considered as one development when considering infrastructure and services, to avoid the risk of massive under provision.

The Northeast Ware development proposes 1,800 homes, up 20% from the 1,500 detailed in the WARE2 master planning policy. In 2018, the East Herts District Plan allocated 1,000 new homes to the site by 2033 with potential for a further 500 homes, subject to suitable highway mitigation measures. No highway measures that mitigate an additional 500 homes have been proposed, let alone a further 300 on top of that. This latest increase is an opportunist profiteering attempt by the developer which must be resisted.

There are four (4) main reasons why this development should not proceed:

1) Traffic

There should be no access from roads in the new development to Fanhams Hall Road as neither Wareside, nor the roads in Ware into which it feeds – High Oak Road and Musley Hill – can cope with the increased volume of traffic. Nor should there be access from the new development to the B1004 at Widbury Hill as neither Stansted Abbotts nor Star Street or King Edwards Road in Ware can cope with the increased volume of traffic that would result. This is, without doubt, the Achilles heel of a poor plan, as the introduction of thousands of extra cars into Ware is far beyond the possibility of the infrastructure of a medieval market town to absorb. Talk of a modal shift is just that, talk. The fact of the matter is that these houses will not be within walking distance of the High Street or railway station, each house will have at least two cars and the residents will use them. The delay in completing the spine road till 1000th home is built will lead to years during which traffic is forced onto the High Street, with rolling queues becoming stationary traffic in the afternoon peak, as shown by the applicants own traffic assessment. The data also shows that construction traffic building phase 1C will generate 80 HGVs journeys per day along Ware High Street which is totally unacceptable, with traffic taking 12 minutes to travel from the A602/A10 junction to the Fire Station roundabout.

How can you create a "sustainable" transport corridor that simply runs from a main road (A1170) to a minor road the (B1004), without offering any sustainable travel options at each end of this corridor? This is just greenwash! The proposals for improved walkability and cyclability are
dominated by adding tactile paving at crossings, adding signs and repairing the footway surface. This should be done through HCC Highways maintenance, not using funds for sustainable travel. Instead proper cycle lanes, widened footways and rerouted traffic should be put in place. The idea of the cycle hire scheme is positive but 70 bikes for the whole of Ware is not ambitious enough and the majority should be electric as the town is hilly. Car clubs are also an excellent proposal, but Enterprise is only suggesting 1 per 90 homes – the town needs the higher CoMo recommended rate of 1 per 50 homes from the start to get residents into the habit of using car club vehicles rather than buying private cars. Again the majority of the car club vehicles should be electric to reduce air pollution locally.

Overall this development will burden Ware with significant increases in traffic levels and congestion, increasing air pollution and road traffic accidents. The model suggests a doubling of traffic journey times through the town by 2029 with bus journey times taking anything between 10 and 50 minutes - with such huge delays, commuters won’t be able to trust the bus to deliver them to the station on time and will revert to commuting by car, and the modal shift plans assumed by the developer will not be achieved. These issues breach EHDC District Plan policies WARE2(ii), TRA2 and EQ4(iv).

2) Water infrastructure issues

We have about 10% of the Earth’s chalk streams in Hertfordshire. Ware’s chalk streams – the Ash, Rib, and Lea are part of a globally rare and internationally important habitat. Ware’s domestic water supply is pumped from the chalk aquifer that feeds the chalk streams. Over-abstraction of water from the chalk aquifer has resulted in our chalk streams being reduced to dangerously low flows; the source of the River Rib has moved downstream to Buntingford, while the Ash is reduced to just 11% of long-term average flows. To proceed with this development without a new strategic water supply would be criminally negligent and verging on ecocide.

The sustainability plan linked to the East Herts district plan notes that our district is “one of the most water-stressed areas of the country” in a sub-region which “experiences water scarcity” and this issue will only get worse with climate change. The draft called for new strategic water resources to provide the 12 million litres / day of water that the 18,485 new homes will require. Yet this requirement was dropped when EHDC passed the sustainability plan without scrutiny or debate, despite the plan’s failure to explain how to provide the water from resources which do not exist! Affinity Water has recently launched a discussion on strategic resource options*, including pumping in water from as far away as Lincolnshire, but there is no firm plan or funding and it can’t be implemented within the timescale required for this development. This breaches EHDC Policy WAT3(i).

Similarly, a current lack of capacity in sewage treatment means that Thames Water cannot meet demand for WARE2. This breaches EHDC Policy WAT6(i) and (ii). Finally the increase in concrete, tarmac and solid materials proposed for the fields in Ware North will inevitably make flooding worse in an area of the town already susceptible to surface water flooding. This breaches EHDC Policy WAT1(ii).

3) Healthcare

East Hertfordshire has one of the worst healthcare provisions in the country, with no inpatient or emergency services provision at all. Hertford County Hospital and the Queen Elizabeth II Hospital in Welwyn Garden City were run down on the understanding that a university teaching hospital would be established in Hatfield. This was cancelled by the austerity coalition, with inpatient and emergency services transferred to the Lister Hospital at Stevenage in October 2014. No additional provision was made for East Herts residents, with no direct public transport links provided and no additional or allocated car parking facilities. What happened to the forty (40) new hospitals promised by central government? What happened to the £350m per week ‘Brexit dividend’ for the NHS? Clearly none of this has been allocated to East Herts! To get from Wodson Park to the Lister by public transport would take a fit healthy person over an hour.

The alternative, Princess Alexandra Hospital in Harlow, is not just overstretched, it's in permanent and terminal crisis. Although a new Harlow hospital is planned, its completion cannot happen within the timescales of the development of WARE2 and it is planned for the far Eastern side of Harlow, more than 12 miles away and difficult to reach by public transport. Similarly, local GP, dental facilities, and all the other aspects of healthcare in Ware are overloaded with registration for an NHS dentist in the area no longer possible.

To permit new housing in the knowledge that there will be an increase in demand for healthcare which cannot be met would potentially be a breach of the Councillor Code of Conduct requirement to "exercise reasonable care and diligence", and a breach of health and safety legislation with the risk of litigation, possibly including corporate manslaughter (Section 11(1) and Schedule 1 of the Act provide that specified government bodies can be prosecuted for Corporate Manslaughter.)†

4) Change of Central Government Policy

The expectations set out by Rt Hon Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities in his letters of 1st and 5th December 2022 to Council Leaders and MPs, set out three very clear expectations for future development and housing:

1. Planning should be about delivering “enough of the right homes in the right places and will do that by promoting development that is beautiful, that comes with the right infrastructure, that is done democratically with local communities rather than to them, that protects and improves our environment, and that leaves us with better neighbourhoods than before”.

2. Councils should refuse planning permissions for development that is not well-designed and housing targets should not be used as justification to grant permission.

3. Local authorities will not be expected to build at densities wholly out of character with existing areas or which would lead to a significant change of character. The new Office for Place will support the Council and its community in achieving this goal.

Statements by Ministers are material considerations at the planning decision stage. Moreover, the district council elections are now only five months away and local residents may wish to take the opportunity to make the elections a defacto referendum on the district plan. In the interests of
democracy and accountability, all further decision making on this development should be suspended until after the elections.

In Conclusion:

The EHGP is of the view that the scheme is not policy compliant and cannot be considered acceptable in planning terms. We cannot support the proposals given the serious implications regarding the lack of essential environmental, social and community infrastructure provision proposed.

Submitted by Alex Daar on behalf of the East Herts Green Party

* https://affinitywater.uk.engagementhq.com/strategic-resource-options

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/corporate-manslaughter

The post EHGP Objection to Land North & East of Ware Hybrid Planning Application appeared first on East Herts.

]]>
EHGP Objection to Gilston Area Outline Planning Application for Villages 1-6 https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/2023/01/31/3-19-1045-out/ Tue, 31 Jan 2023 20:37:05 +0000 https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/?p=1658 Land North Of The Stort Valley And The A414, Gilston, Hertfordshire Ref: 3/19/1045/OUT January 2023 Prepared by Nicholas Cox The Green Belt was established in 1955 to contain urban sprawl, to maintain the separation of settlements, to protect prime agricultural land around settlements, and to encourage urban regeneration and compact towns and cities. It now [...]

Read More... from EHGP Objection to Gilston Area Outline Planning Application for Villages 1-6

The post EHGP Objection to Gilston Area Outline Planning Application for Villages 1-6 appeared first on East Herts.

]]>

Land North Of The Stort Valley And The A414, Gilston, Hertfordshire

Ref: 3/19/1045/OUT

January 2023
Prepared by Nicholas Cox

The Green Belt was established in 1955 to contain urban sprawl, to maintain the separation of settlements, to protect prime agricultural land around settlements, and to encourage urban regeneration and compact towns and cities. It now covers 13% of England; but increasing development in Hertfordshire’s green belt risks suburbanising the London to Cambridge corridor, swallowing East Hertfordshire into a massive conurbation.

EHDC’s District Plan includes two greenbelt developments of some 18,485 new homes. Northeast Ware and Harlow North (Gilston Area Applications) are planned on the largest release of green belt land in England, representing over 6% of our green belt. It is important to appreciate that the two developments are two sides of the same coin and should be considered as one development when considering infrastructure and services, to avoid the risk of massive under provision.

The expectations set out by Rt Hon Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities in his letters of 1st and 5th December 2022 to Council Leaders and MPs, set out three very clear expectations for future development and housing:

1. Planning should be about delivering “enough of the right homes in the right places and will do that by promoting development that is beautiful, that comes with the right infrastructure, that is done democratically with local communities rather than to them, that protects and improves our environment, and that leaves us with better neighbourhoods than before”.

2. Councils should refuse planning permissions for development that is not well-designed and housing targets should not be used as justification to grant permission.

3. Local authorities will not be expected to build at densities wholly out of character with existing areas or which would lead to a significant change of character. The new Office for Place will support the Council and its community in achieving this goal.

The Gilston area development should not proceed for the following reasons:

  • A massive tract of (former) green belt land will be built upon to deliver a very low proportion of affordable housing which falls far short of policy requirements.
  • Education, healthcare, open space, and community facilities will be delivered considerably later than required, contrary to the Garden City principles and the principle of land value capture enshrined in Policy GA1 and the requirement of GANP Policy AG9, putting further pressure on existing communities and already very overstretched infrastructure.
  • Road building, particularly the controversial Eastern Stort Crossing (ESC) has taken priority in the allocation of funding and is being secured through S106 negotiations, whilst sustainable transport measures are insufficiently developed and unlikely to be successful. This will result in development becoming car dependent to the point that both the new community and existing communities will become excessively congested.
  • The proposals totally ignore GANP Policy EX1 which requires the mitigation of impacts of the development on existing communities to ensure a comprehensive and integrated development. The applicants have failed to respond to community concerns about local impacts and have not demonstrated where and how impacts on existing settlements and residents will be mitigated as part of an overall and comprehensive scheme. EHDC have ignored legitimate requests for clarification, thereby failing to act in the best interests of the area and its communities.
  • The Village Developable Areas (VDAs) are such that the villages are not separated by meaningful green corridors (as required by GANP Policy AG4). This had been previously raised by the Council’s own Landscape Officer. The Development Specifications (DS) refer to a minimum width of corridor of 10-40m. This is clearly inadequate and should not be approved. The landscape and countryside should be treated as a structural element to create individual villages set in the landscape as required by policy and the HGGT documents.
  • Building Heights are of particular concern. The Development Specification (Para 4.7.7) identifies a height up to 18m with further 10-15%, and buildings along the edges of the Strategic Green Corridors have a proposed height of 14m plus 5m ‘Limit of Deviation’ – i.e. potentially 19m tall. This is not locally appropriate ‘village character’, in conflict with GANP Policy AG6 and Appendix 3. The applicant also ignores the GANP policy requirements to explain how they intend to create soft edges, a balance between landscape and built form or even to explain what a village built in 2023 could look like.
  • East Hertfordshire has one of the worst healthcare provisions in the country, with no inpatient or emergency services provision at all. Hertford County Hospital and the Queen Elizabeth II Hospital in Welwyn Garden City were run down on the understanding that a university teaching hospital would be established in Hatfield. This was cancelled by the austerity coalition, with inpatient and emergency services transferred to the Lister Hospital at Stevenage in October 2014. No additional provision was made for East Herts residents, with no direct public transport links provided and no additional or allocated car parking facilities. What happened to the forty (40) new hospitals promised by central government? What happened to the £350m per week ‘Brexit dividend’ for the NHS? Clearly none of this has been allocated to East Herts! The NHS Clinical Commissioning Groups for the area have made it clear that there will be a lack of hospital care for the growing population and that they will struggle to staff the primary care centres within the development. This will obviously impact upon the existing population as well as the new residents. To permit new housing in the knowledge that there will be an increase in demand for healthcare which cannot be provided would potentially be in breach of the Councillor Code of Conduct requirement to “exercise reasonable care and diligence”, and a breach of health and safety legislation with the risk of litigation, possibly including corporate manslaughter (Section 11(1) and Schedule 1 of the Act provide that specified government bodies can be prosecuted for Corporate Manslaughter.)*
  • The applicants have failed to make provision for burial grounds in contravention of Policy GA 1. This is an important point considering the lack of healthcare, likely increase in air pollution and road traffic accidents given that local cemeteries will not have the capacity to serve an increase in population.
  • The proposed housing mix will not meet East Herts identified housing needs or target of 40% applied to larger sites in Policy HOU3. A figure of 21% (which could in practice be further reduced over time) is totally unacceptable for a development of this size and on a site which has been released from the Green Belt on the premise of the planning benefits that would be secured. The level of affordable housing provision should be maximised in accordance with policy GA1 and the shared vision for the Gilston area.
  • We have about 10% of the Earth’s chalk streams in Hertfordshire. Over-abstraction of water from the chalk aquifer has resulted in our chalk streams being reduced to dangerously low flows; the source of the River Rib has moved downstream to Buntingford, while the Ash is reduced to just 11% of long-term average flows. The sustainability plan linked to the district plan notes that our district is “one of the most water-stressed areas of the country” in a sub-region which
    “experiences water scarcity” and the draft called for new strategic water resources to provide the 12 million litres / day of water that the new homes will require. This requirement was dropped when our district council passed the sustainability plan without scrutiny or debate, despite the plan’s failure to explain how to provide the water from resources which do not exist! Affinity Water have recently launched a discussion on strategic resource options 2 , including
    pumping in water from as far away as Lincolnshire, but this is just a discussion with no funding behind it and can’t be implemented within the timescale required for this development.

In conclusion:

The East Herts Green Party is of the view that the scheme is not policy compliant and cannot be considered acceptable in planning terms. Given the gravity of the current situation, we cannot support the proposals given the grave uncertainty regarding the funding and delivery of essential
environmental, social and community infrastructure and other benefits and the substantial reduction in affordable housing provision proposed.

Moreover, the district council elections are now only five months and local residents may wish to take the opportunity to make the elections a defacto referendum on the district plan. In the interests of democracy and accountability, all further decision making on this development should
be suspended until after the elections.

Submitted by Alex Daar on behalf of East Herts Green Party

*https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/corporate-manslaughter

 

The post EHGP Objection to Gilston Area Outline Planning Application for Villages 1-6 appeared first on East Herts.

]]>
Objection to Draft Minerals and Waste Plan https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/2022/10/25/objection-to-draft-minerals-and-waste-plan/ Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:38:04 +0000 https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/?p=1604 Hertfordshire County Council is currently reviewing its Minerals and Waste Local Plan documents, through the preparation of a new Minerals and Waste Local Plan. They are consulting on the draft documentation and accepting responses until 31 Oct 2022. Details of the plan and consultation here. The following letter was submitted to Hertfordshire County Council by [...]

Read More... from Objection to Draft Minerals and Waste Plan

The post Objection to Draft Minerals and Waste Plan appeared first on East Herts.

]]>
Quarry Lorries

Hertfordshire County Council is currently reviewing its Minerals and Waste Local Plan documents, through the preparation of a new Minerals and Waste Local Plan. They are consulting on the draft documentation and accepting responses until 31 Oct 2022.

Details of the plan and consultation here.

The following letter was submitted to Hertfordshire County Council by East Herts Green Party Chair, Alex Daar.

---------------------------------------------------

I am writing in response to the Draft Minerals and Waste Plan out for consultation on behalf of Hertfordshire County Council.

I object to the proposed development for the following reasons:

  • The plan over-estimates the scale of future development and construction activity using outdated assumptions based on 2014 projections which have been proved to be excessive, when compared to the 2021 census data. Data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) clearly shows that for Hertfordshire, the number of households at the March 2021 Census was more than 30,000 lower than the 513,090 forecast in the 2014-based projections for 2021.
  • Paras 7.25 to 7.27 refer to “Potential Future Major Infrastructure Projects for Hertfordshire” which are entirely speculative, including a Hertford Bypass which the text says “may be required” but is not approved or programmed, and will be vigorously opposed by local residents. Para 7.28 notes “other additional new or improved rail line projects” including Crossrail 2, a highly speculative new route which is unlikely to proceed given the cost over runs on Crossrail 1. The conclusion in para. 8.2 of the LAA that “it is recognised that the current stock of sand and gravel reserves in Herts is insufficient to meet future demands” is not justified due to the uncertainty of future demand.
  • The plan should focus on recycled aggregate produced from Construction, Demolition and Excavation (CDE) waste recycled from construction sites. Policy 10, “Secondary and Recycled Materials” states that ‘the county council will support the increased use of secondary and recycled materials in order to reduce reliance on land-won aggregates and maximise the amount of inert waste diverted from landfill’. However, the plan does not include any proposals or commitment to implement this policy.
  • The plan would result in a huge increase in traffic and pollution with thousands of extra HGV lorries and very difficult access – the A414 east goes through the centre of Harlow, the A414 west through the centre of Hertford and the A10 south through the centre of Cheshunt. The alternative access route - down the Rye Road Toll Road to the Aggregates railway sidings in Ratty's Lane passes through residential areas around Rye House.
  • The plan will create a vast industrialised area, with the secondary commercial aim of creating a landfill site, or the area being declared “brownfield” post extraction, encouraging house building resulting in suburban sprawl across the Essex County border.
  • The site will destroy a crucial section of the Harcamlow Way, one of the earliest of the waymarked walking trails in this part of the country developed by Fred Matthews and Harry Bitten of the West Essex Ramblers' Association in the 1970s. The footpath is frequented by ramblers, joggers, dog walkers and other council taxpayers of Stanstead Abbotts, Hunsdon and Harlow. The loss of this amenity is totally unacceptable.
  • The plan will result in the destruction of ancient woodland and wildlife habitat for birds and small mammals. However, the site sits in the Green Belt - an area of beautiful countryside in the Impact Risk Zones for the Lea Valley Special Protection Area, Rye Meads SSSI, Hunsdon Mead SSSI and its surrounding areas used by SPA birds. Stanstead Abbott’s Conservation Area and Stanstead Bury Registered Park and Garden (grade II listed) lie adjacent to the site.
  • The plan will result in widespread exposure to harmful noise, dust and diesel fumes for residents including children in the area, and particularly those attending St. Andrews Primary School in Stanstead Abbotts.
  • The plan fails to address the threat to the water supply and aquifers in an area already facing a severe water shortage.

I also take great exception to the letter to residents being headed “Sustainable Growth” without any justification. Why does the minerals and waste planning policy team believe that the wanton and wilful destruction of productive arable farmland in the green belt is in anyway “Sustainable Growth”? This isn’t just spin, it’s an outright lie and as such is totally unacceptable. What you are actually proposing is ecocide and you will attempt to force this plan through despite the valid objections of the council taxpayers who you are supposed to serve because you consider corporate greed to be more important. Do you not have children and grandchildren too? Do you not have souls? Do you not care about the future of our species and planet? We do not own the land that you want to destroy, we are its custodians, and we hold it in trust for our descendants, but you want to destroy it anyway, despite the objections of the majority. This will not only make Hertfordshire poorer, it will make democracy poorer too, you risk unleashing forces that that have been dormant for hundreds of years and I urge you to reconsider.

The post Objection to Draft Minerals and Waste Plan appeared first on East Herts.

]]>
Statement on Wickham Hall Solar Farm https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/2022/08/29/statement-on-wickham-hall-solar-farm/ Mon, 29 Aug 2022 19:27:09 +0000 https://eastherts.greenparty.org.uk/?p=1562 East Herts Green Party have been consulted about the development of a solar panel farm at Wickham Hall. We visited the farm on 16th August to discuss the proposals with the owner.  We would support the development of a solar farm at this site. Below are our reasons. The energy crisis in the UK is [...]

Read More... from Statement on Wickham Hall Solar Farm

The post Statement on Wickham Hall Solar Farm appeared first on East Herts.

]]>

East Herts Green Party have been consulted about the development of a solar panel farm at Wickham Hall. We visited the farm on 16th August to discuss the proposals with the owner.  We would support the development of a solar farm at this site. Below are our reasons.

  1. The energy crisis in the UK is urgent as is the climate emergency. We would rather see energy projects that reduce the need to extract more fossil fuels. Moreover, solar power is far quicker to develop than wind. Given the crisis, we need large scale projects like this rather than relying on homeowners/small businesses to put panels on their roofs.
  2. The farmer has stated the land could be returned to agricultural use in the future. Solar panels will not degrade the quality of the land for agricultural use. Solar arrays are reversible. The land will improve during years of fallow. Much of UK soil is in poor state from generations of farming causing increased need for fertiliser and pesticides.
  3. The farmer explained that they only grow crops that are suitable for animal feed at Wickham Hall. The profitability of this type of farming is decreasing as people reduce their consumption of meat. Less meat eating is good for the planet. Some fields on the farm have become unprofitable to grow crops on as their shape has been compromised by the new bypass. Farmers can only farm to make a profit.
  4. The solar panels will be sited close to the grid. Local energy is efficient. The UK loses 9% of electricity in transmission (25 terawatt-hours in 2021 – source Statista.com report by Bruna Alves 6th Aug 2022).
  5. Whilst we recognise concern by local people about a loss to their amenity whilst walking on public footpaths around this area, we feel the commitments to plant more trees and hedgerows as well as create new paths will mitigate this loss.
  6. We like the farmer’s plans to increase biodiversity on his farm and around the solar panels. We think that with further expert consultation this could be strengthened even more. Biodiversity should be considered at the earliest opportunity. The scheme will need an Ecological Management Plan. A strategic plan that will conserve existing species, conserve, or create core areas of biodiversity and connect these areas to neighbouring farms and land users. Grazing animals should be a part of the plan. East Herts Green Party would be keen to provide input into this. Meanwhile this brochure is a good starting point about how to create wildlife habitats on solar farms.
  7. EHGP request that should the solar farm be approved, planning officers will add conditions to ensure that a site Biodiversity Net Gain of a minimum 10% is required and that the site will be returned to Green field rather than brown field status after the 40 year period has elapsed.
  8. We are excited by the proposals the farmer has in the future which we feel will also improve the environment in the local area. These included ideas around vertical farming, providing locally sourced food and park and ride facilities. The introduction of vertical farming could really reduce negative impacts on the environment through the production of food grown and consumed locally.

The post Statement on Wickham Hall Solar Farm appeared first on East Herts.

]]>